Even when O’Donnell laudably attempted to concentrate the audience’s attention onand hopefully final, Charlie Sheen trainwreck interview, courtesy of the tragic undertow that threatens to pull Sheen underneath for beneficial, I was overtaken, not from the pulling about the thread, and the voracious audience he serves. It did not make me unfortunate, it crafted me angry.
With regards to celebrities, we will be a heartless country, basking within their misfortunes like nude sunbathers at Schadenfreude Beach. The impulse is understandable, to some diploma. It can be grating to pay attention to complaints from consumers who appreciate privileges that many of us can’t even consider. When you can’t muster up some compassion for Charlie Sheen, who tends to make more revenue for any day’s get the job done than most of us will make inside of a decade’s time, I guess I cannot blame you.
Along with the quick tempo of activities on the net plus the specifics revolution sparked by the Web-based, it is rather effortless for the technology sector to think it’s one of a kind: continuously breaking new ground and performing facts that no person has at any time done just before.
But you can find other sorts of corporation which have previously undergone some of the identical radical shifts, and have just as great a stake in the future.
Consider healthcare, for example.
We sometimes feel of it as being a vast, lumbering beast, but in fact, medicine has undergone a series of revolutions in the previous 200 many years which are at the very least equal to people we see in solutions and information.
Much less understandable, but nonetheless inside the norms of human nature, would be the impulse to rubberneck, to slow down and investigate the carnage of Charlie spectacle of Sheen’s unraveling, but for the blithe interviewer Sheen’s existence as we pass it inside ideal lane of our every day lives. To become truthful, it may be difficult for folks to discern the difference amongst a run-of-the-mill consideration whore, and an honest-to-goodness, circling the drain tragedy-to-be. On its own merits, a quote like “I Am On the Drug. It is Identified as Charlie Sheen” is sheer genius, and we cannot all be expected to get the total measure of someone’s lifestyle each individual time we listen to something humorous.
Swiftly forward to 2011 and I am endeavoring to take a look at signifies of being a bit more business-like about my hobbies (for the most part new music). From the end of January I had manned up and began to advertise my weblogs. I had designed several unique blogs, which have been contributed to by mates and colleagues. I promoted these pursuits as a result of Facebook and Twitter.
Second: the very little abomination the Gang of Five about the Supream Court gave us a 12 months or so back (Citizens Inebriated) literally features somewhat bouncing betty of its individual that may quite properly go off inside the faces of Govs Wanker, Sacitch, Krysty, and J.O. Daniels. Considering that this ruling prolonged the notion of “personhood” to both corporations and unions, to try out to deny them any most suitable to run within just the legal framework that they were organized below deprives these “persons” from the freedoms of speech, association and motion. Which means (the moment yet again, quoting law school trained family members) that both the courts really need to uphold these rights for the unions (as person “persons” as assured by the Federal (and most state) constitutions, or they've to declare that these attempts at stripping or limiting union rights have to use to leading companies, also.
Cantor Calls Out ‘Fraudulent Mortgage Actors,’ But Republicans Are Still Gutting Foreclosure Prevention
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) appeared on CNBC today to discuss the GOP’s vision for the economy and the budget. Cantor promised that the Republican majority in the House is “listening” and wants to go about “evening the playing field” between, amongst other parties, “fraudulent mortgage actors” and the homeowners they’ve harmed:
CANTOR: At the end of the day, really, in this country, it’s about everybody having a fair shot. And it’s the private sector employers and employees thinking they don’t have a fair shot cause there’s something going on with their politicians and the government worker unions. People are feeling, still, that fraudulent mortgage actors have caused their home values to be depressed and they can’t see that come back. There’s people looking at the gyrations on Wall Street thinking ‘hey, wait, a minute, what about my 401(k)?’ And so what we’re going to be about in Washington is to try and say, you know, you’ve got now a majority in Congress in the House that’s listening, that wants to go about evening the playing field, to give everybody that fair shot.
Watch it:
It’s good to hear Cantor admit that fraudulent mortgage lending took place. But while he’s acknowledged that reality today, Cantor has not had much sympathy for foreclosed-upon homeowners in the past. He criticized the Obama administration’s foreclosure prevention efforts as helping people who are not “playing and paying by the rules,” and said that those facing foreclosure simply “have to take responsibility for themselves.”
And Cantor’s position mirrors that of most House Republicans. When the “robo-signing” scandal first broke — which involved banks violating due process by approving foreclosures without actually examining the proper documentation — House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) decided that the proper remedy was to investigate whether poor people took out mortgages they couldn’t afford. House Republicans also voted en masse against the Dodd-Frank financial reform law, which created a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to police fraudulent and predatory mortgage lending.
House Republicans are also currently trying to “pull the plug” on federal foreclosure prevention programs, with Rep. Randy Neugebauer (R-TX), Chairman of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, saying that foreclosure prevention efforts simply “need to stop.” It’s fine that Cantor seems finally willing to accept that abuses occurred, but House Republicans have made it abundantly clear that they don’t plan to grapple with any of the fallout those abuses caused.
Im having a hard time understanding why people are not demanding that bank of america at the very least BE DISMANTLED.
WHAT IS IT ABOUT THE PRECISELY DOCUMENTED CASES OF PEOPLE WHO DIDNT EVEN HAVE MORTGAGES AND WERE FORECLOSED ON THAT AMERICANS ARE HAVING A HARD TIME REALIZING IS OUTRIGHT CRIMINAL ACTIVITY? Will it take these sociopaths going to everyones home and saying “we show that we own this property, we are going to take it and sell it for our own profit” for americans to wake up and put an end to this ridiculous lunacy once and for all?
It deserves to be yelled.
If Washington wants a solution, Dissolve the bank and distribute the assets to everyone. Its that simple.
Its a business that has repeatedly perpetrated theft, exploitation, and violation of law. There is no reason that it should be allowed to continue operating. If the shareholders are worried about their “stakes.” Give them the money of dissolved assets and allow them to reinvest it where ever they want.
That will boost the economy.
Give the wee homeowners who were tangled up in barb wire for 5 years enough to rebuild their lives.
Take enough for the government to be able to steady itself and devote the resources to securing this ship in good stewardship like it obviously needs t be.
And be done with it.
Really. Why are we empowering an entity to wreak havoc on us all? Who are these 25,000 or so individuals working in the upper echelons of mega banks and wall street that should be so protected, and sit comfortably on pilfered accounts while the majority struggles to make ends meet?
Enough is enough.
I want my government to do what is right and disable these crooked thieves before it becomes a matter of failure of us all.
Source: http://removeripoffreports.net/ online reputation management
The best in online reputation management
No comments:
Post a Comment